-Name That Tune- Contest, part 03

on Thursday, October 15, 2009
Here is the song that you have to identify for this round of the contest. Be one of the first three people to respond with the answers to the three questions below, and I'll ship you a pair of DVD's full of music, anywhere in the world:





1. Tell me the name of the song that is referenced.

2. What was the name of the Musical that this song originally appeared in? Or, if you'd prefer, who was the historical character who sang the song in the musical?

3. Tell me a story that you have associated with this song.


Original contest notes/details can be found here: Original Post

-Name That Tune- Contest, part 02

on Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Ok, we had a bit of confusion with yesterday's contest because the post disappeared off the main wall on the Facebook page, which is where it gets the majority of its viewings. Hopefully this one doesn't do the same thing. Here is the song that you have to identify for this round of the contest:







1. Tell me the exact name of the song that is referenced.

2. In Two Words, tell us why this song was famous.

3. Tell me the year the song was released.

4. Most importantly, tell us a funny story. If your story relates to the song, that's the best, but if not, post a good story anyway. Don't worry if it takes you a few minutes to type up your story - if you come up with a great story and you have posted it within fifteen minutes of the last of the first three winning entries, I'll send you a prize anyway. If your story relates to item number two on this list, that's a good one to explain.


Original contest notes/details can be found here: Original Post

-Name That Tune- Contest, part 01

on Monday, October 5, 2009
Here is the song that you have to identify for this edition of the contest:







1. Tell me the exact name of the song that is referenced.

2. Tell me the Artist who sang the original song.

3. Tell me the year the song was released.

4. Most importantly, tell us a funny story. If your story relates to the song, that's the best, but if not, post a good story anyway. Don't worry if it takes you a few minutes to type up your story - if you come up with a great story and you have posted it within fifteen minutes of the last of the first three winning entries, I'll send you a prize anyway.


Original contest notes/details can be found here: Original Post

New -Name That Tune- Contest

Ok, I want to run a small contest here, but this will be a very silly one.

I have several funny "chart" graphics that each represent a popular English-language song from the past forty years or so. I am going to post one of these charts about once every two to four days until I run out. Each time that I post one, someone is going to become a winner for the round.

To become a winner, you must be the first person who respond to my posting on my Facebook fan page, , and you must include ALL of the following items to be eligible:

1. Tell me the exact name of the song that is referenced.

2. Tell me the Artist who sang the original song.

3. Tell me the year the song was released.

4. Most importantly, tell us a funny story. If your story relates to the song, that's the best, but if not, post a good story anyway. Don't worry if it takes you a few minutes to type up your story - if you come up with a great story and you have posted it within five minutes of the first winning entry for that round, I'll send you a prize anyway.


Prizes: Don't get too excited, because there is no cash here. However, I'll mail a Pair of DVD's full of promo music to each winner. The DVD's will include some of my mixes, some of my individual tracks, and some other individual promo tracks that I like.

Since the prizes have no tangible cash value (although you'll love the music), this offer is valid for anywhere in the world. I don't mind paying the postage, so don't be scared to enter if you're far away from Canada!

ALL of the DVD's that are sent to winners will be mailed on November 20th, so I can include a number of the best entries from the "Global Underground (Alone In New York)" Remix Contest.

Thanks, and good luck.

Edited October 24th: I was originally going to pick three winners for each round, but since most people thought that only the first responder would win a prize, I'll switch to that format. To make up for the lower number of prize-winners, I'll make up a lot of extra graphics for other songs, so there are some extra rounds. Don't worry, multiple-winners in the first four rounds won't be retroactively disqualified!

Separating a Mixed CD into Individual Tracks

on Sunday, October 4, 2009
Do you want to split a long continuously-mixed CD up into individual tracks, so you can jump from song to song, but still want it to play "seamlessly"? This page will help you learn how. It usually takes almost an hour to cut a CD up into individual tracks, and definitely longer the first time you do it, but it is fairly easy. Warning: if you aren't at least moderately comfortable with Desktop Audio Software, you might not want to read any further.

This information is useful if, for instance, you have a full CD-length mix, which is one continuous track that has all the songs beat-mixed together. This can be a pain in the ass when you burn the single-track mix onto a CD and you want to find a specific song within the mix, or if you're driving in a car with a poor stereo and it hits a bump and goes back to the very beginning of the CD.

I'm going to use Adobe Audition (formerly known as Cool Edit Pro) and the Ahead Nero burning program in my examples. You can probably take the same approach with most other high quality music editors and burners, but with minor changes to procedures. A lot of burning programs say that you can pick a number of "set-points" within the mix, and the CD will automatically break things up for you. Unfortunately, although I have played around with this feature in a couple of programs, I have never had much success with the "set-points" approach, so I learned to do it manually.

Basically, what we're going to do is very simple. We're going to cut the mix up into a number of different files, and then burn each file onto the CD in order, with no automatic 2-second space between tracks. Let's start with the Adobe Audition portion of the project.

Start Audition, and open your mix in single waveform view, not as a track in the multi-track view. At this point, I should caution you that while I have done this a number of times with wave files, I tried it once with an MP3, and I got little "hiccups" whenever the track changed. I don't know if this was because I was using an MP3 as the source file, or if it was some other problem. I usually work with WAV files, so I didn't investigate this issue any further. To be safe, if you have a choice, you should definitely start with a wave file. Stick with the highest possible quality right from the start. I guess at this point I should also teach you how to convert an MP3 to a wave. It seems redundant to be doing this, since MP3 is a compressed format, and by converting an MP3 to a wave, you are NOT increasing the quality, you are just making the file several times larger. Therefore, the ONLY time you would ever want to do something dumb like this is because of the fact that I don't think an MP3 blends seamlessly when cut up. Anyway, you probably have two choices. You can probably load the mp3 into Audition then choose "save as" and set the filetype to Windows PCM wave. Or, what I have done in the past is to go into Winamp, go into Options then Preferences, go to Output Options, and change the setting from "DirectSound Output" to "NullSoft Discwriter." When you load up the MP3 and play it, nothing will come out of your speakers! Instead, it will "play" much faster than normal, with no sound, and the file will be written to the hard drive as a .WAV file. Where, I don't know. You'll have to check your preferences/configuration settings for the discwriter option and see where the file is going.

Anyway, back to Audition. Now you should have your .WAV file loaded. At this point, chose "save as" and make a backup copy with a different name than the original. You're going to do your editing on that backup copy. That way, if you screw things up, your original is still safe.

The next thing you should do is go through the file and figure out where you're going to put all the track divisions. This will probably take the majority of the time. Once you know where you're going to be splitting the file, the rest of the process should only take about fifteen minutes.

Count how many separate tracks you have. For instance, if I was cutting up one of my old mixes (Welcome To The Machine), I would make a list that looks like the following:

01. Playsound, 00:00
02. Spirit, 06:53
03. Losing It, 12:30
04. Waterfalls, 16:24
05. Inkfish, 20:33
06. PFN, 25:34
07. Drifting, 30:58
08. Lovely, 34:24
09. Disorientation, 39:02
10. Girl, 43:02
11. I Love Techno, 49:05
12. Musak, 52:30
13. Tell You, 54:19

Obviously, I have thirteen tracks on this particular mix. Go to the beginning of the last track, in my case, the 54 minute and 19 second mark. If you're just doing this for kicks or to learn something new for fun, you don't have to get any more accurate than to the nearest second - as long as you're close, things are good. However, if you're like me, you want to start things exactly at the start of the proper beat. To do this, I play the stuff on the screen for several seconds before the track split to get a feel for exactly where I want to split it. Then, I highlight about a fifth of the visible screen (as seen in Audition) and then chose the yellow button on the lower left of the zoom controls, which means "zoom to selection." Whatever area you have just selected now fills the entire visible part of the timeline. Play the bit leading up to your cut again, and once more get a feel for where it is. Then, once again, select about a fifth of the screen around your intended track split, and zoom into your selection again. Eventually, by repeating this process a couple times, you'll get to the point where only three or four seconds of the overall wave file are visible on the screen, and you know where the exact beat is that you want track 13 to start on, both in terms of visual representation on the screen, and time-wise.

At this point, you want to test it. Place the cursor at the beginning of the beat you want your track 13 to start on, in other words, just before the graphic representation of the wave starts to get some substance (volume) to it. Now, press play, and see if it sounds like a "good first beat to a track" should sound. If not, move a little to the left or right, until you've found a starting spot that sounds good. Once you're happy, move the cursor over that point again, click your left mouse-button and HOLD IT DOWN, then move the mouse to the right of the screen. The wave file will start scrolling very rapidly (or so it looks) to the right, toward the end of the overall file. In reality, because you are zoomed in to such a high magnification, it may take thirty or forty seconds before you reach the end of the file. Once you stop scrolling to the right, and NOT BEFORE you are all the way to the end, you can now let go of the mouse button. Now, go up to "file" and chose "save selection as" from the drop-down menu. Save it as "track 13 - whatever". Then, hit the delete key once. This will eliminate whatever you have just saved as track 13 from the mix. Your wave file will now contain only the music for tracks 1-12.

Repeat the process outlined above for track 12. Go to the 52:30 mark (in my example), zoom in until you sound like you have a good start point, then highlight from that point to the end of what remains of your mix. Save the selection as "track 12 - whatever", then delete the selection with the delete key, and get ready to start the process again with track 11.

Keep going until you only have tracks one and two left on the screen. Isolate and save track 02 as you have for the other tracks, as described above. Now, all that is left is the first track. Save it as "track 01 - whatever". Of course, this time you're just doing a "save as" with whatever is left, instead of picking a selection. By the way, for all tracks with single digits, it is smart to add a zero to the listing, ie. save "track 2" as "track 02." This matters first with track 09 (as you are working backwards), because it is the first single digit track you will encounter while tracking down. The reason for this will become clear in a minute.

Throughout this entire process, except for the very last track (track 01), make sure you always click "save selection as" rather than "save as". I've made that mistake before, and had to start the whole process over again from the beginning.

Ok, so now you have a folder on your computer somewhere with thirteen different .WAV files to represent the thirteen individual tracks. Of course, the main master .WAV file that you started with may also be there, which is fine. Open up your Nero burning program now. Find the folder. Drag and drop all thirteen tracks into the "burn" panel on the left side. NOW you probably understand why I said to make all the single digits have two digits - because it keeps them in proper order, so your CD doesn't burn in this order: track 1, track 10, track 11, track 12, track 13, track 2, track 3, and so on. Computers aren't dumb unintentionally, they were just built that way. Of course if you didn't add the zeros, you can manually rearrange the tracks so they are in the proper order, but that's extra work that can be avoided if you're smart as you save each individual track.

Now, highlight tracks two through thirteen. Once you have done that, right-click on one of them, and choose "preferences." You will see a window come up with the title "audio track info." There is a place there that says "pause" and there is normally a value of 2 (seconds) in it. Change this to zero and hit OK. Now, tracks 02 and higher should all say 00:00 for the pause value, while the first track should still say 02:00. Basically, there is normally a two-second pause inserted between each track when you are burning a CD full of tracks. However, because you want it to sound "seamless," you don't want that pause to happen. Therefore, you set it to zero seconds pause before each track starts. For some reason, the computer won't let you put anything less than a two-second pause before the first track - if you do, your CD probably won't play. However, that shouldn't matter - it's the start of the disc, and nobody notices. There is probably a good technical explanation of why the first track needs a minimum two second pause, but I'm not going to ask Sony why this is the case - it was probably just one of the conventions decided on when the big corporations came up with a plan about how to structure the CD industry.

Ok, here's the final thing you need to do: obviously, you're burning this as an AUDIO CD and not as a CD-ROM. However, you need to set the "write method" in Nero to say "disc-at-once" rather than "track-at-once" or "disc-at-once(96)". This is the only way you'll get a smooth, continuous flow of music when listening to your CD. If everything worked properly though, you will be able to use the "next track" and "previous track" buttons on the CD player to jump back and forth to the start of the different songs, or I should say more accurately, to wherever you put your setpoints.

By the way, always make sure you "finalize" your CD. If you do not finalize the CD, it will play with no problems in pretty much any computer CD/DVD player. However, if you do not finalize it, it will NOT play in the vast majority (about 99%) of normal home stereo CD players and automobile CD players and portable discman players. It would be embarrassing for you to test the CD in your computer, to make sure it works, then give it to someone and the have them discover that it doesn't play in their car stereo because you forgot to finalize it.

The method that I've outlined here SHOULD work and SHOULD be transferrable to other programs with a minimum of hassle, but if it doesn't quite work right the first time, just play around and experiment. You'll learn more by experimenting than you will by emailing someone else who doesn't have time to answer you.

One final note that I should point out is that it is not necessarily a wise move to "cut up" mixes that you're distributing on the internet, because of potential legal issues. If you separate a mix into each of the individual tracks and then offer it free to the world on the net, you are going to really piss off the artists that have tracks on the mix. Cutting it up makes it easier for people to get free copies of their music, which is frustrating for music producers. A mix that remains fully mixed is generally tolerated because it features the artists' music and often encourages other DJ's to purchase some of the better tracks that they hear on the mix. But if the mix comes as a group of individual songs, the incentive to go out and buy the songs is negated. So the main reason that I'm providing this information is for personal use only. I don't offer any cut-up mixes on my website, for the very reasons that I've just outlined. I want to support the artists who make the music that I play, rather than reduce their potential sales.

Good luck!


PS: If you want to cut a CD up into parts for use in the car, etc., but don't want to take the time to find the exact perfect moments where one song "becomes" another, just cut the mix up into five minute sections. The "songs" may not start at the beginning of a song, but at least if the CD skips and goes back to the beginning, you can forward through it in five minute chunks to approximately where you left off.

-Global Underground- Remix Contest

on Sunday, September 6, 2009
[Voy a tratar a incluir traducciones en espanol después del inglés, abajo de esta página].


[Edit, January 25, 2011: Many of the winning entries from this contest can now be found on my SoundCloud page, where you can download them for free].


About a year ago, I wrote a track that I called 'Global Underground,' in homage to the great Global Underground mix series. Read the lyrics, and you'll see exactly why I gave it that title, although I was also considering using 'Alone In New York' as a subtitle (especially so there isn't too much confusion with Global Underground's official mix series).

I'm going to be releasing a couple of different remixes of that track later this Fall, but in the meantime, I'm also going to use the acappellas for a Remix Contest on my website.

The contest will be open to anyone around the world, except in jurisdictions where such a contest is prohibited by law (ie. Quebec). The top prize is $500, and the second and third prizes will be $250 and $100. In addition, several of the best tracks will be featured on my website and fan page.

The lyrics were recorded as a spoken voice story. Therefore, there does not have to be a specific melody associated with the lyrics - I don't have a specific melodic hook that you need to stick to. If you create a remix that features some or all of the full lyrics, my personal opinion would be that it would be best to produce a progressive house track. The full storyline is a bit lengthy though, so I would consider using bits and pieces. Less is probably better. We also recorded a lot of sound bytes for all the city names, and also some other random phrases. If you wanted to produce an entry that is a breaks or drum & bass or trance track, or dub/instrumental, those would also all be easy to create using only the limited city-name vocals, or parts of the "random phrases" file, and you could therefore omit the original storyline altogether. All of the original vocal files are available as audio files at the bottom of the DJ Mix Downloads page.

If you want to hear a sample of what the track could sound like, I've included a version that you can listen to in this blog post. Click on the widget below to listen to a sample of some of the vocals overlaid against a partial track that Jay Vasseur threw together, and provided for me to use. Please note, however, that all submissions to the contest must be your own original work - they can NOT be re-edits of someone else's track, with the Global Underground lyrics added. If the music submitted is not your own original work, your entry will be disqualified.

If you wish to enter two separate tracks into the contest, you may. The only restriction is that multiple entries must be different styles from each other, rather than just small changes.

Whether or not you enter the contest, we would appreciate your assistance in spreading information about this remix contest by posting the link on your favorite production/audio message boards!

Good luck in the contest! Winners will be announced in November. Go to the bottom of this page now, to download the acappella package for the contest. Incidentally, I've written out the lyrics at the bottom of this post, if you're interested in reading them.

- Jonathan Clark (DJ Bolivia)

PS: Check out my fan page on Facebook, www.facebook.com/djbolivia




Listen to one sample idea for this track: you can right-click here to download the sample file).



Hola!

Alrededor de un año atrás, yo escribí una canción la cual llame 'Global Underground.' Lea la letra de la canción, y usted se dará cuenta de porque le di ese nombre a la canción, aunque yo estaba considerando usar 'Alone In New York' como un subtitulo (visite la pagina Global Underground verdadero).

Yo voy a hacer el lanzamiento de un par de diferentes mezclas de esa canción en el otoño, pero por ahora, yo únicamente voy a usar la canción para un concurso de mezclas en mi pagina Web.

El concurso va estar abierto para cualquier persona en el mundo, excepto en las jurisdicciones donde esa clase de concurso es prohibido por la ley (por ejemplo la provincia de Québec, Canadá). El premio mayor será de $500 y el Segundo y tercer premio serán de $250 y $100. Además, la canción puede llegar a ser promocionada en mi pagina Web y en mi Fan Page.

Las letras fueron grabadas como una historia hablada. Entonces, no tiene que haber una melodía específica que esta asociada con la letra de la canción. Si usted crea un re-mix que ofrezca alguna parte o toda la letra de la canción, mi opinión personal seria que es mejor producir una canción de house progresivo. De cualquier forma, nosotros también grabamos muchos sonidos para todos los nombres de las ciudades. Si usted quiere producir un numero de breaks o batería y bajo o pista de trance, o dub/instrumental, esos también serian fáciles de crear usando las canciones vocales con los nombres de las ciudades. Todos los archivos de vocales están disponibles como archivos de sonido.

Si usted quiere escuchar una muestra de como la canción podría sonar, yo incluí una versión que puede ser escuchada en este blog post. Haga clic en el widget que esta abajo para escuchar una muestra de algunas de las canciones hechas en relación a la canción Jay Vasseur. Tenga en cuenta, que todas las sumisiones para el concurso deben ser su propio trabajo original, no pueden ser canciones reeditadas de alguna otra persona con las letras de Global Underground añadidas.

Buena suerte en el concurso! Los ganadores serán anunciados en Noviembre mis propias mezclas sean lanzadas. Ahora vaya a esta página a incorporar la competencia. Yo he escrito la letra de la canción en la parte final este post, si usted esta interesado en leerlas.

Muchas gracis a Nic Roldan de Calgary/Colombia por assistarme con las tradducionnes en este poste. La gramática era demasiado dura para mí este vez.

- Jonathan Clark (DJ Bolivia)

PS: Visite mi página en Facebook, www.facebook.com/djbolivia










Full Original Lyrics:

"Bolivia - Global Underground (Alone In New York)"

When I was young, I always wanted to visit a real city. I was born in Virginia, but I didn't grow up there. I grew up outside a small town, where I lived with my quiet family. We didn't travel much.

When I turned seventeen, we finally got the internet at my house, and my whole life changed. I spent almost every night online, reading about places and people that I hoped I could meet someday.

It wasn't too long after I got the internet that I started downloading music. I didn't like the music on the radio station in my own town, but there was a lot of better music that I discovered online. And one night, I discovered some music that would change my life.

I downloaded a CD of music called The Global Underground. I really liked the name. The music was all by a DJ named Danny Teneglia. It was a show that he had played at a club in London. I loved it. I must have listened to that CD about two hundred times.

Eventually, I learned that there were more Global Underground CD's. Dozens of them! There were DJ's playing that kind of music in cities all over the world: San Francisco, Milan, Tokyo, Athens, Moscow, Toronto, and of course, New York.

By the time I turned twenty-two, I knew that I had to get away from home. I couldn't stand the thought of spending the rest of my life there, with the same old boring small-town boys. My family didn't say too much. They said that they didn't want me to leave, but I think that they were secretly glad that I was leaving. So I took a bus and I went to New York. I felt so alone.

New York is a pretty scary place for a small town girl who's never left home before. I didn't understand the bus routes. I was scared to use the subway, even though people said it was safe. I felt like the buildings were closing in on me, and I wanted to go to a park, but I thought that even Central Park was dangerous.

Anyway, I got over some of my fears eventually. I found an apartment right away, although it was pretty dirty. But at least it had four locks on the door. And I found a job at a little variety store with a couple booths for people to eat at. I helped the owner stock the shelves and mop the floors. I got to know the regulars. But I still felt so alone.

One day, a couple of boys came in. We didn't get many young people in our store. One of them was pretty cute. I overheard them talking about this club that they were going to on Saturday night, named Pacha, to see John Digweed. I couldn't believe it. For years, I had dreamed about seeing John Digweed play!

I didn't have much money, and I didn't know much about the clubs yet. I thought I couldn't afford to go out to shows, but I knew then and there that this would be my one treat to myself. This was the whole reason that I had come to New York in the first place – for the music.

When Saturday night came, I was so excited. I got there an hour before the doors even opened, because I didn't want to miss a beat. Once I got inside, the club seemed really dark. As I walked through the club towards the dance floor, I couldn't believe how loud the music was playing. But I kept going, and a minute later I was out on the dance floor, all alone.

That night was one of the best nights of my life. I just couldn't stop smiling the whole time. The bass shook my entire body. The lights left me feeling blind most of the time, but I didn't need to see anything. I just danced the entire night, and got lost in the music. People were smiling and dancing with me. It changed my life. For the first time ever, thanks to the music, I didn't feel alone.


- Lyrics written August 5th, 2008
Copyright (2008, 2009) Jonathan Clark.

Separating Vocals from Songs

I've gotten quite a few inquiries from people recently on how to separate or remove vocals from a song, so they can then remix those vocals into a different track. It's very difficult to do, but it IS possible in some cases, so I'll outline a way to make it happen here.


First, in order to do this, you need to find a radio edit of the song that you like, with vocals. Then, you also need to find the exact same version of the song but as an instrumental, ie. without the vocals. If you can't find both of these two versions, then this trick won't be possible.

Next, you need to import the two audio files into your sequencer. Line them up perfectly in parallel, down to the millisecond (actually, to the exact sample). You need to be able to play them simultaneously so that they sound exactly like just one song (except for the vocals standing out, of course).

Now, convert each track to mono, so the two stereo channels are combined in each track. They need to be panned to the center.

Once you've done the above steps, and you know that they are completely synchronized, then take the instrumental track and invert the phase of the entire track.

Now, play the two tracks together, or bounce them to disk. The phase inverted version in the instrumental will cancel out the waveforms of the music in the vocal version, leaving only the vocals behind.

Now if you cannot find the full song as both a vocal take and an instrumental with the same arrangement, then you're almost out of luck. The only rare exception is that if you have just the vocal version, sometimes (in theory) you can pull tiny snippets of the vocals out from the track by cutting it up and following the steps above (for instance if there is a chorus with vocals and another "chorus" chord arrangement in the song without singing). This wouldn't work with rock songs, because they are recorded live and they won't be exactly the same, even if the musicians tried to play them exactly the same. But in today's studio-heavy world, some pop songs which are computer produced are probably generic enough to make it work. I've never actually tried this, but in theory, you might find some songs that you could do it with.


Let's step back for a while and ask why you're separating the vocals from a song. I presume that you're trying to remix a track that you like. Are you doing it because you like that track specifically, and no other? If you're doing this as a project for an artist, they should be able to provide the vocals for you. If you're doing it for yourself, then you face a bigger challenge.

An audio file that contains only vocals and no instruments at all is called an acappella. This term is actually a contraction of two Latin words, "a cappella," which literally means "from the chapel," or figuratively, "from the choir." You can do internet searches for acappella tracks in all kinds of places: Google, torrent sites, and legitimate music sites. The trick is to remember that many people spell the word incorrectly. To search effectively, you should search for "accappella" and "acappella" and "acapella" (this last one is the most common spelling and yields the best results in searches, although some people argue that the one with two P's is more correct). If I had a preference, I'd like to see things spelled correctly. So if you're a producer who is releasing acappellas, let's see if we can change the world together, and start spelling it with two P's.

Personally, rather than bang my head against a wall trying to find vocals for a specific track that I want to remix, I do it this way: I'll spend half an hour on the net, trying to locate an acappella for that particular song. If I can't find one in that amount of time, I'm probably not ever going to find one. Sometimes, it is better to just admit defeat and look instead for acappellas in general, and then pick one that you like which is already available.

There are a lot of acappellas out there. If you search download or torrent sites, you can find lots of legal ones that you can download very quickly. Some have to be purchased, but many are free, depending on which sources you use. Go to www.beatport.com as an example. Enter "acappella" into the search engine, and you'll find several hundred tracks to choose from. Enter "acapella" and you'll find thousands.

In rare cases, if you are looking for a specific song, you can actually contact the artist and ask if you can have a copy of the vocals. Some artists will give these out, although it's pretty rare on major labels unless you happen to be a very well-known remixer with a lot of previous credits on your resume. Many smart studios/artists will recognize the fact that the more often that their songs are remixed, the more publicity (and therefore royalties) that go to the copyright holders for the songs. The remixer doesn't get any royalties (except in certain uncommon exceptions for top remixers). Usually, all the money is made by the original artist (or I should say, more accurately, by the studio). Of course, you do also have to recognize that a bad remix of a track doesn't help much, because it won't get played and therefore won't drive radio-play or other royalties. Some artists/studios will provide vocals under strict conditions that the artist/studio gets to review the remix first before it is allowed to be released, and they have the right to prevent the remixer from releasing the remix if they don't like his/her version of the song.


So anyway, the moral of the story is that if you have your heart set on remixing one specific song, sometimes there are options. But usually, I find it is best to listen to some of the thousands of vocal recordings that are already out there, and choose one of those readily-available tracks to remix.

Good luck with your remixing projects!










Follow Jonathan Clark on other sites:
        Twitter: twitter.com/djbolivia
        SoundCloud: soundcloud.com/djbolivia
        YouTube: youtube.com/djbolivia
        Facebook: facebook.com/djbolivia
        Main Site: www.djbolivia.ca
        Music Blog: djbolivia.blogspot.ca